Search for: "People v. Score" Results 301 - 320 of 1,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
  As the blog at US News summarized: Some people -- including Brian Leiter --- have argued that if U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:24 pm
The American Bar Association's "Judge's Journal" summer issue is publishing his lengthy paper, Large Recording Companies v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:59 am by Venkat Balasubramani
California’s constitution limits the rights of some property owners to exclude people. [read post]
The federal researchers concluded that a 40-year-old man with a clean driving record and a strong credit score would pay $1,655 annually for car insurance. [read post]
19 May 2016, 10:17 am by Karen Gullo
The law which would ensure that people won't face criminal liability for violating terms of service agreements or other solely contractual agreements. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:31 pm
You will want to know your credit score and understand exactly how much debt and savings you have. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
At least 147 people were sickened, and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
Network analysis studies the relationships between things, be it people, information, or computers. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Cooley, the Court granted leave to consider whether offense variable (OV) 19 was properly scored at 10 points under MCL 777.49(c), because the defendant “interfered with or attempted to interfere with the administration of justice,” based on his conduct in throwing away evidence and denying guilt. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:08 pm
Some people whose Bar exam scores are in the data set (1972-2007) that Sanders wants. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:56 am
In 2004, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 1:31 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The term “disparate impact” was first used in the 1971 Supreme Court case Griggs v. [read post]