Search for: "People v. Wells (1970)" Results 301 - 320 of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 5:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Not sure how well this would work for the people subject to shaming sanctions.) [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:19 am by Michael O'Hear
  I’m reminded of the movement to reform federal sentencing in the 1970? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
(The incurious Supreme Court, both majority and dissent, was oblivious to this fact as well as the extensive regulation of asbestos-containing products by the federal government.) [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:38 am
Thanks to Greg Lastowka for pointing me to this case: Bach v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Much more could be said about these events, as well as those that followed. [read post]