Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 4,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:34 pm
Plant Insulation Co. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
United States, 122 F. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:00 am
PPG Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
United States, 122 F. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:09 am
Miyoko’s Kitchen v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:28 am
See State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
EPA and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
In the case, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 8:44 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:59 am
Plant Equipment v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 2:41 am
In Occidental Chemical Corporation v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 4:18 am
Henry v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:18 am
In Rothchild v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:54 am
Brodie v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:11 pm
The forts witness was then called in theenvironmental crimes trial of U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 2427. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
The plant is the only active nuclear plant in California, and supplies nearly 10% of the State’s electricity generation. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 6:06 am
Miyoko's Kitchen v. [read post]