Search for: "Powers v. State Bar (1988)"
Results 301 - 320
of 351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm
” The chemical weapons attack on the Iraqi Kurdistan town of Halabja on March 16, 1988 killed thousands of people and was the worst single chemical attack undertaken by the Saddam regime, not to mention by far the largest use of chemical weapons in an otherwise mostly short list since the end of WWII. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
A: Spite is a powerful motivator; what about good experiences? [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Law Society of British Columbia and Black v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:03 am
Dow Chemical Co., 487 U.S. 1234 (1988). [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:04 am
Woodard v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
Except that Dopson-Troutt actually cited Hahn v. [read post]
16 Nov 2024, 10:00 am
IndiaMoitra v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 4:32 pm
Circuit described the ICA’s prohibition of impoundment as valid law and quoted a memorandum written by then-Assistant Attorney General William Rehnquist (as head of the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel) stating that, with respect to presidential impoundment power, “existence of such a broad power is supported by neither reason nor precedent. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 (1988); and 4) petitioner was denied the effective assistance of counsel during the penalty phase. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm
In 1997, in response to a lawsuit filed by the New York State Bar Association, the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:51 pm
" Mordenti v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Rev. 145 (1988). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[2] In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
(Read here my 2002 article published in the NY State Bar Journal recounting the tax-driven history of the LLC movement.) [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:17 am
My best guess is that this is preparatory to regulations that will address ‘rent to rent’ set ups, after Rakusen v Jepsen. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
This was promising and could have been a very useful event for the copyright bar and the Board itself. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Also helps explain 1962 expansion of confusion; 1988 constru [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
And Perry also supported Texas’s fatally flawed lawsuit against Pennsylvania, his own home state, and three other states. [read post]
