Search for: "Small v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 7,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm
Thus, the measure was nearly identical to the ban in federal law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in January of last year in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:03 pm
According to "reform" advocate John Pfaff, the national drop in prisoners has been "pretty small" and two-thirds of it has been in California. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
This may seem like a small detail; after all, states may still allow their “partial public employees” to unionize, just not under the agency shop model. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Free Trade v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:34 pm
The net result, however is the same: a fairly small number of aliens, with no bona fide connection to the United States, would actually be subject to the ban. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 5:22 am
United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 6:50 pm
City of Portland v Unites States of America, 969 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir CA 8/12/2020) [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:57 pm
Today, the Appellate Court issued Small v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
The Senate intelligence committee has said that a small number of states had their election computer defenses breached by Russian hackers in 2016. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
(David Kopel) So said the unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 11:54 pm
Second, Small v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:13 pm
Facts: This case (Peters v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:14 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:58 am
The thousands of geospatial firms in the United States, which include many small businesses, are among the most capable and qualified geospatial firms in the international market [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
(quoting United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land, 80 F.3d 1074, 1078 (5th Cir. 1996)).[6] Although this is a change in Florida procedural law, it most likely will not have much of an effect on the admissibility of expert witnesses in state court cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
(quoting United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land, 80 F.3d 1074, 1078 (5th Cir. 1996)).[6] Although this is a change in Florida procedural law, it most likely will not have much of an effect on the admissibility of expert witnesses in state court cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
(quoting United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land, 80 F.3d 1074, 1078 (5th Cir. 1996)).[6] Although this is a change in Florida procedural law, it most likely will not have much of an effect on the admissibility of expert witnesses in state court cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
(quoting United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land, 80 F.3d 1074, 1078 (5th Cir. 1996)).[6] Although this is a change in Florida procedural law, it most likely will not have much of an effect on the admissibility of expert witnesses in state court cases. [read post]
