Search for: "State v. James" Results 301 - 320 of 9,965
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Seyfarth attorneys Michael Wexler, Robert Milligan, and James Yu will address the following topics: Significant new legislation on non-compete and other restrictive covenants and related court decisions that may impact their enforcement Discussion of legislative and regulatory efforts to narrow use of non-competes, including the impact of Biden’s July 9, 2021 Executive Order and other potential federal legislation The Defend Trade Secrets Act and tips for navigating the law and an… [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, the final reading for the course will be Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 7:51 am by Stephen Bilkis
Background On March 2, 2005, 25-year-old Jeremy Killenberger and 25-year-old James Croote were passengers in a car being driven by Kevin Miller on State Route 7 in Princetown, Schenectady County. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Matthew Waxman
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  In contrast, the United States did not even begin scheduled air mail service until 1918. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Corpus Linguistics and Heller, 59 Wake Forest Law Review 609 (2021) (with James C. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
We are stuck in a perpetual state of betwixt and between, a kind of innovation limbo. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
We are stuck in a perpetual state of betwixt and between, a kind of innovation limbo. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:44 am
Pennsylvania State Capitol BuildingHome of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court In the case of Mallory v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:40 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]