Search for: "State v. Lyon" Results 301 - 320 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am by Melina Padron
HM (Iraq) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1536 (13 December 2011) December 13, 2011 Iraq country guidance immigration tribunal decision quashed as 2 parties not represented. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:15 am by Rosalind English
R v Michael Peter Lyons [2011] EWCA Crim 2808- read judgment Moral objections to the UK’s involvement in Afghanistan do not constitute a defence to an insubordination charge, the Court Martial Appeal Court has ruled. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:19 am by tracey
Supreme Court McGowan (Procurator Fiscal) v B (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 54 (23 November 2011) Jude v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 55 (23 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Ltd [2011] EWCA civ 1445 (01 December 2011) Oso v Newham University Hospital NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 1423 (01 December 2011) Francis v London Borough of Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 1418 (01 December 2011) Proactive… [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Other New York courts have enforced an equitable buyout of an LLC membership, albeit under special circumstances where the courts characterized the relief as a species of "liquidation" based on a finding of grounds for dissolution, such as in Lyons v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]