Search for: "State v. Beard" Results 301 - 320 of 476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2015, 4:44 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Hobbs:  Is there any valid reason for a prison not allowing a prisoner to have a half-inch beard if he sincerely believes his religion requires it? [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  In his Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, Charles Beard thought the Constitution was written, more or less, to “crucify Mankind upon a Cross of Gold,” by imposing hard money on yeoman farmers and other private debtors that made it hard to repay their debts. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Many, following Charles Beard, thought the Constitution of the United States an instrument for protecting individual rights to the detriment of the common good. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:01 am by Amy Howe
Hobbs, a Muslim inmate’s challenge to a prison policy that prohibits him from growing a beard for religious reasons, with puppies. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-326 Title: Beard v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 1:38 pm
Beard , No. 05-9001 In habeas proceedings arising from defendant's capital murder conviction, district court's grant of habeas relief on the ground that the state prosecutors had withheld several pieces of material exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady is affirmed where the cumulative effect of the multiple Brady violations was to undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am by Ronald Collins
Ceballos (2006)), and prisoner speech (Beard v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:27 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
The Court also looks to Vice Chancellor Parsons’ decision this past May in Beard Research v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
Pole position belongs to state-on-top habeas case Beard v. [read post]