Search for: "State v. Reinhardt"
Results 301 - 320
of 476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 8:28 am
Hoang v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:06 am
Kennedy was also the author of a broader gay rights ruling in 2003, Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:15 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:52 pm
The Court will consider this question in No. 06-989, Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm
That ruling was in a 1997 case, Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
The Huffington Post’s Mike Sacks discusses how Judge Reinhardt’s narrow ruling, “with reasoning clearly designed for a future Kennedy decision,” might backfire by relying too heavily on Romer v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:41 pm
Brown, authored by Judge Reinhardt, has been widely lauded in the last few weeks by marriage equality proponents for its creative minimalism. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
Notably, Judge Reinhardt does not hold there is a right to same sex marriage, only that CA had no rational reason to take away the label of marriage for use by gay and lesbian couples after the state had had already given it. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:15 pm
The question is whether states are required to allow gun shows on their property. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:00 am
By Eric Goldman Browne v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 4:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm
" Woodford v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:22 am
The law should also grant courts the power to craft equitable remedies for persons like the plaintiffs in Li v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:40 am
Anderson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
" He briefly discusses Romer v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:04 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:08 pm
Moreover, the state court (Arizona) had a reasonable basis to deny the claim.U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 3:25 pm
A footnote at the end of Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt's opinion for the Court noted the maneuver on AEDPA's constitutionality, but said the panel was "now persuaded" that one of the Circuit's own precedents, Duhaime v. [read post]
