Search for: "State v. Rodriguez"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2007, 5:49 am
" United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:36 pm
Rodriguez-Rivera, 63 M.J. 372 (C.A.A.F. 2006).That leaves two out of twenty cases in which CAAF granted meaningful relief based on, at least in part, a Jackson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:49 am
AC32383 - State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:42 am
In Calcano v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Supreme Court, Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
Maria Rodriguez, as mother and next friend of Angel Gutierrez, a minor v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
On March 15, 2024, a United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss in the matter of Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 5:42 am
This is illustrated in a January 2020 opinion from the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, styled, Mario Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:53 pm
The decision list Judges David Young and Rosa Rodriguez. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
Following the discussion about the utility of the Supreme Court stating a rule as to whether, and for how long, a car stop can be extended beyond its lawful justification, all of which arose out of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
(See Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:20 am
Supreme Court refused to recognize education as a fundamental right in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Supreme Court refused to recognize education as a fundamental right in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 4:49 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm
Pursuant to Graham v. [read post]
