Search for: "State v. Sutton"
Results 301 - 320
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 12:41 pm
Co., 308 AD2d 475, 476-477; Michaels v United States Tennis Assn., 295 AD2d 222; Jamaica Sav. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:52 am
” As one might expect from a foremost advocate of state constitutional law, Judge Sutton also noted the plaintiffs’ pursuit of parallel relief in state court under the state due process clause—a path that might avoid some of the federalism and separation-of-powers hazards concerning many at the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 12:33 pm
Sutton v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:07 pm
The United States filed its application on October 18. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:36 pm
Responding to a reporter’s question about oral arguments in HHS v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:54 pm
” Alabama Assn. of Realtors v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:12 am
” (syllabus)) Sutton v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
On the merits, Chief Judge Sutton explained why the district court's decision represented an unwarranted expansion of the 14th Amendment's limitations on state lawmaking. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:01 pm
"Earlier coverage of Harbison v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:56 pm
US v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
That question was answered in 1936, by the Beaumont Court of Appeals in the case, Love et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:06 pm
In Marhefka v. [read post]
9 Aug 2006, 4:02 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:33 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
United States (on circuits courts' power to enhance criminal sentences sua sponte)No. 06-7517, Irizarry v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
” Mitts v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
Sutton's opinion has been viewed as especially important because he is a respected conservative judge who, as appellate lawyer, often argued in favor of state sovereignty. [read post]
