Search for: "Still v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 44,449
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2025, 12:12 pm
Be still, my heart . . . [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 11:06 am
(Wilbanks v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 10:53 am
While still serious, not all charges for possession of a controlled substance carry a felony penalty. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 9:22 am
See CCIA v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 7:24 am
The Committee’s thoughts on the revised proposals include the following points: (i) Existing powers are sufficient: The Committee states that it is still unclear why – if there is an immediate risk of consumer harm – it would not be considered an ‘exceptional circumstance’ which would demand disclosure of an investigation and, as a result, the Committee remains uncertain why a broader interpretation of ‘exceptional circumstances’ could… [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 9:08 pm
The memo states that the confirmed U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm
But at least twenty-six Republican senators who voted against conviction explained their votes by saying that in their view, Trump was not subject to an impeachment trial, because he was no longer in office.[1] For reasons that have been explained at length elsewhere, that was a lousy argument.[2] But if nothing else, it gave cover to Republicans who knew that Trump’s conduct related to January 6 was impeachable but still preferred not to cross him. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 4:59 pm
From Judge Jamal Whitehead's opinion today in Deimert v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 2:27 pm
New York v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 7:27 am
Still, the case implicates related doctrines, so I discuss it here as a bonus. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:29 am
On 5 February 2025, the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its opinion in the case of C 413/23 P European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (Opinion). [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 2:51 am
” (Gurney-Goldman v Solil Mgt., LLC, No. 655549/2023 [Sup Ct, New York County Jan. 30, 2024]). [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 8:27 pm
” State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 3:30 am
See Winter v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
Robbins in Kisor v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 2:48 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 11:03 am
In Attorney General v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 8:42 am
Doe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 4:31 am
Abbey v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 9:30 pm
" You are there for the argument of King v. [read post]
