Search for: "UNITED STATES FINANCE COMPANY v. Page" Results 301 - 320 of 454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
According to the Heritage Foundation’s 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, Canada now enjoys a greater degree of economic freedom than the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
Lupin Ltd. concerning LoSeasonique and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:25 am by Abhinav Chandrachud
A recent United States Supreme Court opinion in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Vodkat falls foul of extended passing-off: Diageo v Intercontinental Brands (IPKat) (Class 46) (IP finance) Think twice before copying yourself! [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by Adam Thierer
 Chairman Leibowitz claims that online companies “haven’t given consumers effective notice, so they can make effective choices. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(Inventive Step) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses W D Washington on rare interference ruling: Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Cardiac Science Operating Company (Washington State Patent Law Blog) CAFC: Design patents – symmetry requires elimination of points-of-novelty test for anticipation: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens Corporation (Patently-O) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Means plus function claim element does not cover ‘spectrum of undisclosed… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP)   United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(IP Watch)   Canada EU demands for trade deal would reshape Canadian IP law (Michael Geist) Federal Court considers colour marks: Peak Innovations Inc v Simpson Strong Tie Company (Canadian Trademark Blog)   China China’s standards and patent innovation proposals: problems for IPR and global trade? [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
In the Chrysler bankruptcy case (Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
(IP finance)   Global - Copyright Anti-piracy outfits demand cash without proof (TorrentFreak) eBay supports Creative Commons again! [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Jones(IP finance)   Poland New Chairman of the Polish Chamber of Patent Attorneys (Class 46)   South Africa Department of Trade & Industry proceeds with plans to convert CIPRO into self-standing commission (Afro-IP) CIPRO Risk Manager suspended on charge of ‘breach of confidentiality’ (Afro-IP)   Spain Supreme Court on slogan trade marks: no need of a special treatment (if anyone still doubted) (Class 46) Rock band La Quinta Estación name dispute… [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Czech Republic Czech Arbitration Court wants to speed up UDRP process (Managing Intellectual Property) Finland Finland, Spain bringing 1Mbps broadband to everyone (Ars Technica) Germany More on IPCom and its litigation with HTC in Germany (IAM) India Google Book settlement – Indian government protests... finally (Spicy IP) Cybersquatting gets sharp rap from INDRP Arbitration: Bloomberg finance wins (Spicy IP) Sweden Swedish internet traffic recovers after… [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:25 pm
As most people here probably know, the Court heard oral argument last September in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG)   United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]