Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 301 - 320 of 1,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is an issue of first impression for the Eighth Circuit, an issue that several district courts have confronted, but only one other circuit court, the Eleventh Circuit (Tapscott v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:40 am by Patricia Salkin
Paul, Minnesota, alleging violations of its rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), as well as its rights under the constitutions of Minnesota and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by franchiselawadmin
Section 280E refers to a provision in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) of the United States. 280E has significant implications for businesses involved in the sale of controlled substances, including marijuana (or “cannabis” under Minnesota law). [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm by NARF
Pollack (Cultural Resources; National Historic Preservation Act; Tribal Consultation) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html J.P. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
" Here defendants had the right to hold religious ceremonies (with invited guests) on land ceded to the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
Appellant is also admitted to practice in federal court in the District of Colorado, the District of Alaska, the Southern and Western Districts of New York, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is our guide to the amici (we’ve highlighted the must-read briefs in red): The United States: Here. [read post]
The overbreadth doctrine is “strong medicine,” and has a tendency, as Justice Antonin Scalia noted in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm by NARF
United States (Bad Men Clause; Court of Federal Claims) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html In re H.V. [read post]