Search for: "United States v. All Funds on Deposit"
Results 301 - 320
of 488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
The Court also stated that the legislature has failed to give the drainage districts any authority or funding mechanism to pay money damages if they were awarded. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm
The Court also stated that the legislature has failed to give the drainage districts any authority or funding mechanism to pay money damages if they were awarded. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
United States et al., Civil Action 02-2010, United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:35 am
The partnership, known as S-L Properties, acquired the unit in 1984. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:10 pm
The balance of the Settlement Fund will be distributed when all outstanding appeals have been resolved and the matter has become final.2. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 2:26 am
Last week, an appellate panel of the Third Circuit, in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
Prior to Myriad, the US Supreme Court held in Mayo v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:05 am
While the letter makes it clear that a fund board cannot delegate its responsibility to make the required determinations, it expressly states that directors do not have to review each transaction in order to make the required determinations. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 10:35 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Skrobot along with eighteen others on February 5, 2008 at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois located in Chicago.[4] Mr. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Skrobot along with eighteen others on February 5, 2008 at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois located in Chicago.[4] Mr. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
Grosz v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
Five years later, in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
v=fz3Gl0-qyU8 (Please note that this demo video is old and does not reflect all of our features of the DataNovo platform.) [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Matt Stoller explains U.S. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
