Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 301 - 320 of 6,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Asignacion sought to have the Philippine arbitral award set aside in the United States under the public policy exception in Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:34 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
The Supreme Court heard oral argument last week in Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Rod Rehm
The law established by the United State Supreme court in Thomas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:33 pm by webmaster
  Among the options for those wishing to ensure the continuation of class actions is amendment of the FAA to accommodate state policy choices. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:34 pm by Robert Epstein
  On this day, a majority of the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
The main educational paradigms in the United States are public school, private school, and home school. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the pretrial freeze of a criminal defendant’s untainted assets violates the Sixth Amendment right to retain counsel of choice. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For instance, while the United States and Singapore determine the COMI based on the date of the application for recognition is filed, the United Kingdom and Australia use the date of the filing of the foreign proceedings and the date of the hearing of the recognition application, respectively, as the relevant dates to determine the debtor’s COMI. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 6:27 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit opened its October 29th opinion in Cardoni v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 6:27 am by James P. Flynn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit opened its October 29th opinion in Cardoni v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 1:57 pm
On August 10, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision of the lower courts in the matter of Alexsandr Nikolaevich Kashin and the United States of America v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Fletcher and Fort posted “Intimate Choice and Autonomy: Adoptive Couple v. [read post]