Search for: "United States v. Line Material Co." Results 301 - 320 of 971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm by Barry Sookman
At a minimum the party to be bound must be shown to have been aware of the Terms and Conditions at the time of purchase: see Kobelt Manufacturing Co v Pacific Rim Engineered Products (1987) Ltd, 2011 BCSC 224 at para 124, 84 BLR (4th) 189. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am by Jeffrey Vicq
  Many of my clients were concerned about a line of United States cases, decided over the last several years, that regarded innocent filing errors in applications, renewal forms, and other correspondence with the US Patent and Trademark Office as attempts to perpetrate a fraud on the Office, justifying refusal, expungement, or some other highly punitive penalty. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  If the perpetrators of the EDGAR hack did trade on material, nonpublic information stolen from EDGAR, it was not a case of unlawful insider trading. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am by Carolyn E. Wright
”  Henry Holt & Co., to Use of Felderman v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am by Carolyn E. Wright
”  Henry Holt & Co., to Use of Felderman v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:35 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Accordingly, this is not a situation, as in Parke-Davis & Co. v. [read post]