Search for: "United States v. Sharpe"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 7:41 am
The following post is by Mark Graber, co-editor with Mark Tushnet and Sanford Levinson of the recently published Oxford Handbook of the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
[1] Complaint at 1-2, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
A police action in the premises of a local newspaper journal had resulted in sharp criticism on social media and websites. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:57 am
United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm
Sharp v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:38 am
UCANN v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
With the Delta variant on the rise in the United States, hospitals in states where vaccination rates are now seeing a sharp rise of new COVID cases, and some counties reinstating mask requirements, the pandemic continues. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:28 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am
Sharpe); holding that the states may not apportion a chamber of their legislatures in the manner in which the United States Senate is apportioned (Reynolds v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Larry Craig v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:23 am
In 1993, Horphag was granted the United States trademark for the mark Pycnogenol. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
See also United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
See White v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
Which might start with a critique of the manner in which Judge O'Scannlain unhelpfully begins his opinion, with a first paragraph that reads (in its entirety): "We are called upon to decide whether an alien may be removed from the United States for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude as determined under federal immigration law. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
