Search for: "United Stationers, Inc. v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
” California: On May 14, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a lengthy decision (Vance’s Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Enquirer, Inc. (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 991, 1009; see also Frommoethelydo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 1 February 2017, the Court of Appeal for Ontario handed down judgment in the case of The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
Muriel Bristol was a biologist who studied algae at the Rothamsted Experimental Station in England, after World War I. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm by Schachtman
Muriel Bristol was a biologist who studied algae at the Rothamsted Experimental Station in England, after World War I. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Today's court ruling should be a wake-up call for the United States Senate to do its job, hold hearings on RFS2, and address the adverse impacts of this unrealistic program. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am by Susan Haines
(“Quickway”), through its affiliates, has terminals with trucking operations throughout the United States, including a terminal in Louisville, Kentucky that only provided services for a national grocery chain. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Will Baude
Americans United for Separation of Church & State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464, 473 (1982). [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:47 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (“Standard Stations”) the Supreme Court devised what has become known as the “quantitative substantiality” test. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 5:53 pm by Joel O'Malley
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which involves the extent to which employers must provide pregnant employees work accommodations provided to other non-pregnant workers with work limitations under the PDA. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
In the final petition consolidated in the Branzburg proceedings, the Court considered the petition for certiorari of the United States from a decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Caldwell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation       United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
It is the finest bench, pound for pound in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hamilton (10th Cir. 1995) (upholding a Kansas criminal defamation statute as facially valid after interpreting it to require actual malice); see generally United States v. [read post]