Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes" Results 301 - 320 of 559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm by req@quintilone.com
  It means that courts in California are narrowing the scope of applicability of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young It has been more than a year since the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:58 am by AALRR
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a divided Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided 6-5 en banc to affirm the decision of the trial court to grant class certification in a discrimination lawsuit alleging Wal-Mart Stores discriminates against its women employees. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On appeal, Tyson contended that certification was improper because employees’ individual routines varied and, thus, the litigation could not generate common answers apt to drive the resolution of the litigation as required under Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:31 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Cleveland Partner Greg Mersol and Summer Associate George Skupski contributed an entry examining the application of Daubert standards to expert testimony at the class certification stage in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
   This decision is significant for employers because the Court follows the instruction given by the Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:24 pm by Nassiri Law
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., involved of a group of 18 women who had originally been part of the landmark U.S. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:49 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Judge Harold Baer, Jr. denied class certification (and denied summary judgment) for the interns, relying largely on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  As you may recall, he did a previous guest post regarding the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision to adopt the Wal-Mart v. [read post]