Search for: "Williams v. Superior Court"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 2:30 pm
Because the controversy involved many questions of law and fact, a class action would be superior to other available methods for fair and efficient adjudication, the court concluded.The decision is Nelson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 11:35 am
Williams, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 11:35 am
Williams, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:32 pm
He did, however, allow for delay damages on the jury’s award for future pain and suffering as that has previously been permitted by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Gross v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:17 am
On 6 August a lawsuit was commenced in Los Angeles County Superior Court challenging SB 826 ( Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:41 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
Yesterday's oral argument is a nice reminder, however, that the level of mastery of background law with which William Rehnquist and John Paul Stevens long amazed their clerks is the product not only of superior intellectual skills but also of years of hard work and experience. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
CV07-2039KA, Superior Ct., Chatham County). [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 8:24 am
In Gbadehan v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
My concerns with Kelly v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:49 pm
WIATT v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 5:41 am
Among her many staggering incompetences, DC Superior Court judge Natalia Combs-Greene then denied NR’s motion to dismiss the fraudulent complaint while simultaneously permitting Mann’s lawyers to file an amended complaint. 4. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:22 am
See Matter of Stortecky v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 10:02 am
Wrigley Jr. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
By William W. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 7:34 am
ReBath-v-OReilley-VerifiedComplaint [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:07 pm
Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:53 pm
While the attributes identified by SCJ were relevant to the inquiry and might weaken the case for deceptiveness, they did not allow a ruling on the issue as a matter of law.Guidelines issued by the Federal Trade Commission provided that a product label containing an “environmental seal,” such as a globe icon with the text “Earth Smart” around it, “is likely to convey to consumers that the product is environmentally superior to other products” and would be… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:38 am
The allegations of ascertainable loss were unsupported conclusory statements insufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss, the court determined.The purchaser’s claims were dismissed without prejudice because it was conceivable that she could plead ascertainable loss with specificity, the court said.The opinion in Lieberson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
