Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 12,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
While we may agree that Regulation 44/2001 does not affect the jurisdiction of arbitrators, can the same be said of wider European law? [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 10:45 pm
” OG Notice 27 March 2007. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:21 pm
However, a finite proposed class period does not defeat certification of a class under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:42 am
If a wine produced by a Minnesota farm winery meets the absolute minimum of the State’s threshold, the wine would not even qualify for an appellation of origin or an AVA under the federal regulations. (27 CFR 4.25(b)(1)(i) requires at least 75% of the wine derive from grapes or fruit within a named appellation; 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)(ii) requires at least 85% of the wine derive from grapes within the boundaries of a named AVA.) [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 11:35 am
”It turns out that the two studies, which are both coauthored by Miller-Kovach, provide pretty meager support for these claims.One study took 132 adults with BMIs between 27 and 35 and randomized them to “1 of 2 systems for appraising food intake” (I guessing, the old points and the new points system). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:43 am
The federal regulation at issue, 27 CFR § 7.71(c)(1), provides in relevant part, “[f]or malt beverages containing 0.5 percent or more alcohol by volume, a tolerance of 0.3 percent will be permitted, either above or below the stated percentage of alcohol. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:11 am
Posted by HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Friday, July 1, 2016 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of June 23–June 30, 2016. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 7:50 am
We will continue to examine the Final Rule’s impact on companies, especially once the rule takes effect on April 27, 2020. [read post]
15 May 2010, 5:54 am
” Id. 27. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
Today the Court of Justice ruled as follows: "1. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 5:28 am
This date clearly does not start the statute of limitations. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:32 am
The Applicant acknowledged that the dependent claim explicitly recited that the opposing magnet repelled the first magnet, but argued that claim differentiation did not apply: The Examiner's claim-differentiation argument is inapt because claim 27 does not have to further limit the term “opposing” for this claim to be different in scope from claim 1: claim 27 adds other limitations, such as “a guard,” and “a shoe. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:42 am
If a wine produced by a Minnesota farm winery meets the absolute minimum of the State’s threshold, the wine would not even qualify for an appellation of origin or an AVA under the federal regulations. (27 CFR 4.25(b)(1)(i) requires at least 75% of the wine derive from grapes or fruit within a named appellation; 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)(ii) requires at least 85% of the wine derive from grapes within the boundaries of a named AVA.) [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 10:04 am
That's 27 servicemember deaths in the last 4 weeks, all but 1 of them Americans. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:57 am
The Yonce case does, however, raise some issues. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:31 am
The comment period ends on July 27, 2018. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
September 27, 2007)(unpub.), for what happens or can happen if the defense does not object on the merits or sentencing; United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:42 am
If a wine produced by a Minnesota farm winery meets the absolute minimum of the State’s threshold, the wine would not even qualify for an appellation of origin or an AVA under the federal regulations. (27 CFR 4.25(b)(1)(i) requires at least 75% of the wine derive from grapes or fruit within a named appellation; 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)(ii) requires at least 85% of the wine derive from grapes within the boundaries of a named AVA.) [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Which brings us to Part I.B.1 of the court's opinion, entitled: On April 27, 2005, plaintiff was informed that a friend and colleague ... had been terminated .... [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am
Code §§ 2701(a)(1) and 2707(a)). [read post]
