Search for: "Laws v. State" Results 3181 - 3200 of 155,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2009, 2:35 pm
Brand (University of Pittsburgh - School of Law) has posted Treaties and the Separation of Powers in the United States: A Reassessment after Medellin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
[Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing] The oral argument today in Trump v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:57 am
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government R (S) v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
The issue of whether an employee has suffered a requisite “adverse employment action” under our state’s whistleblower law when transferred out of his longstanding job into another after he blows the whistle on his employer’s violations of law or public policy, was recently addressed by the New Jersey Appellate Division in Jeffrey Scozzafava v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:02 pm by Christopher J. Walker
In an essay forthcoming in the Ohio State Law Journal, David Zaring and I set forth a way for the SEC, Congress, or maybe even the Supreme Court could save agency adjudication. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
The court did not decide whether an out-of-state law could serve as a predicate for a UCL claim because no out-of-state laws were involved.Process Specialties, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:02 pm by Robichaud
Nedelcu and the law against compelled evidence and weakens then right against self-incrimination Yesterday the Supreme Court of Canada released the judgement of R. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am by Robert Hougham
In turn, Max Mosley v News Group Newspapers, is a prime example of a claimant not having advanced knowledge prior to publication and therefore being unable to prevent publication.The basis of Max Mosley v UK is best summarised by Dominic Crossley (Steeles Law LLP) stating:“…although we all have a right to privacy, it is entirely up to the editor of a newspaper whether or not we are able to exercise that right in any effective or meaningful way. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am by Evangelina Cantu
The MEPA Limitation arbitrarily excludes all activities from review of cumulative or secondary impacts from GHG emissions without regard to the nature or volume of the emissions absent a requirement by federal law. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
This Essay presents the Court’s recent decision in Wooden v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am by MBettman
On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:50 am by Matthew Kolken
Supreme Court will hear the following case today: Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Susan Haack (University of Miami - School of Law) has posted Pragmatism, Law, and Morality: The Lessons of Buck v. [read post]