Search for: "State v. Cook"
Results 3181 - 3200
of 3,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
They are primarily operated and developed on a state-by-state bar association basis. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:28 pm
In the second, Warren v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
“plaintiff or his or her attorney shall file, at the office of the clerk of the court in which the action is pending, an affidavit showing that the defendant resides or has gone out of this State, or on due inquiry cannot be found, or is concealed within this State, so that process cannot be served upon him or her, and stating the place of residence of the defendant, if known, or that upon diligent inquiry his or her place of residence cannot be ascertained, the… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
Cook County courts require that a court reporter be present at the final prove up hearing. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:00 am
Kelton v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
Stearns v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:50 am
” Roberts announces that Justice Kennedy has the Court’s opinion this morning in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 4:30 pm
(Justice Barrett readily cited California v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
She then lost the group’s support over Weaver v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 12:44 pm
In Grutter v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 5:52 am
Hughes and Stephen Hughes v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
After setting forth the statutory language applicable to teachers, the letter turns to the United States Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:13 am
§362(b)(2)(A)(v). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
A recent case, Dickerson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 3:55 am
” Central Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
See State of Indiana v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:28 am
Indeed, when a Supreme Court plurality in Barnes v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
Upon ingestion, the spores leave their dormant state and become active in the intestines. [read post]
