Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 3181 - 3200 of 4,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2024, 8:15 am by Alaa Hachem
Here we take a step back to examine the legal claims made by South Africa in its application, the basis for South Africa’s claim for standing to bring the case, what to expect as the case unfolds, and the possible broader legal effects of the case, including for the United States and other allies of Israel. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a very brief summary: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Misinformation has always been with us, but the endemicity of social media and the depth of political polarization in the United States and elsewhere has enabled falsehoods to be amplified, monetized, microtargeted, and spread around the world at unprecedented speed and scale. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:47 am by Guest Author
  And that it’s fine to upend well-established administrative enforcement mechanisms across the federal government, at least until Congress goes back and inserts “notwithstanding section 1331 of title 28, United States Code” into a dozen or more statutes. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:47 am by Guest Author
  And that it’s fine to upend well-established administrative enforcement mechanisms across the federal government, at least until Congress goes back and inserts “notwithstanding section 1331 of title 28, United States Code” into a dozen or more statutes. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Anthony Kennedy’s term would have ended in 2011 rather than 2018, before he wrote opinions such as  United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]