Search for: "United States v. Morales" Results 3181 - 3200 of 3,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm by Bernie Burk
  But it beggars plausibility to suggest that two deeply experienced Washington white-collar litigators, representing an embattled President of the United States on issues of the highest imaginable profile, both made the same dumbass blunder regarding intensely sensitive tactical and strategic information in a popular DC restaurant located adjacent to the offices of the New York Times. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Marty Lederman
In any event, it's not obvious that this statute implicates that concern, because the ACA does not create such a duty: If there is someone out there who does not already maintain insurance and who has a moral or other objection to "go[ing] into commerce" just yet (i.e., before that person "goes into commerce" to consume health care), section 5000A gives that person an alternative means of satisfying the legal obligation--namely, by making a "shared… [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 5:48 pm by Yvonne Nath
So can a unit of a legal technology company (LZ Legal Services is a unit of Legal Zoom). [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Ransomware attacks have grown almost exponentially for several reasons: The ransomware business model works, with the FBI stating that ransomware is on pace to become a one billion dollar source of income for cybercriminals in 2017;  Ransomware start-up costs are cheap. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Efficiency states that, discounting transaction costs, the ultimate distribution will be efficient. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Justifying Hamas's murderous pogrom by saying Israel deserved what it got is nothing less than supporting a terrorist organization – the same as blaming the United States for 9/11. [read post]
The media coverage of the protest sparked a full-fledged movement against the South African government as well as the corporations tied to it inside the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm by Adam Thierer
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  This case was a culmination of years of lobbying by the big media groups, and in particular News International, to import into the UK law of defamation the same pre-eminence given to free speech by the United States, based on the first amendment of its constitution. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
The case under discussion today has the truly odd name of USA v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
First, unlike the paid labour market, it generally lacks institutionalisation through appropriate regulation, moral, social and legal.[7] But the lack of an institutionalised environment does not suggest that there is an absence of complex relations of exchange and supply and demand. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am by Neil Hamilton and Louis Bilionis
New Interpretation 303-5 states that “professional identity focuses on what it means to be a lawyer and the special obligations lawyers have to their clients and society. [read post]