Search for: "Doe 3" Results 3201 - 3220 of 195,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2016, 8:45 pm by JP Sarmiento
However, for Schedule A cases, the employer does not have to go through the labor certification process. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 1:05 pm
“Scan-ready” means the document is unbound and does not have tabs or (for original proceedings) a red cover.Briefs:A party filing an electronic copy of a “brief” is required to send only three (3) paper copies. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:25 am by Yuanchung Lee
Ct. 2319 (June 24, 2019), invalidated the residual clause of § 924(c)(3)(B) as unconstitutionally vague (and a conspiracy does not qualify under the elements clause). [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:14 am by Allan Blutstein
FBI (D.D.C.) -- finding that: (1) FBI and CIA performed adequate searches for records concerning plaintiff and his father; (2) FBI properly relied on Exemption 7(E) in refusing to confirm or deny whether plaintiff’s name appeared on any watch lists; and (3) CIA properly invoked Exemptions 1 and 3 in refusing to confirm or deny existence of responsive classified records.Summaries of all published opinions issued since April 2015 are available here. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 4:26 pm
  (See these recent alerts regarding the DOE loan guarantee program and the related application process) After reexamining Title XVII, the DOE has concluded that the statute does not require a first lien on all project assets. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 4:26 pm
  (See these recent alerts regarding the DOE loan guarantee program and the related application process) After reexamining Title XVII, the DOE has concluded that the statute does not require a first lien on all project assets. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:47 am by PaulKostro
§3B:3-2(b), which provides that a Will that does not comply with the above requirements nonetheless “is valid as a writing intended as Will, whether or not witnessed, if the signature and material portions of the document are in the testator’s own handwriting. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:34 am by SHG
But this begs the question: Does the Court need fixin’? [read post]
The post Local-Controversy Test Does Not Require A Showing That The Local Defendant’s Conduct Forms A More Significant Basis For The Claims Asserted Than The Conduct Of The Other Defendants appeared first on CAFA Law Blog. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:49 am by Ted Frank
I'll be debating Tom Geoghegan November 3 on this topic at Loyola University Chicago School of Law. [read post]