Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 3201 - 3220
of 11,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2009, 11:37 pm
The leading case for this proposition is Williams v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:22 am
M-I Drilling Fluids UK Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 7:28 am
, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:34 am
The audio recordings and transcripts undoubtedly will be of interest to a few law students and historians but most people today “watch” their news on television or the Internet. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 1:48 pm
CNH presented a number of arguments – here are a few of the more interesting ones: CNH argued that it was entitled to a new trial because defendant Kinze presented a previously-undisclosed video at trial. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In Texas v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
For the third time in December, the Third Department, in Scheffey-Hohle v Durfee, held that a requested relocation was not in a child’s best interests. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Ghazaryan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
"There are many better class-action law firms in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
This waiver argument was supported by a few Superior Court (that’s Pennsylvania’s intermediate appellate court) cases from between 2004 and 2007 (Tucker v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:04 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
One such setting is raised by an interesting and important case, Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm
The current “uniform” state acts came int [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
(The most interesting previous case, in my opinion, is U.S. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:53 am
The most interesting thing likely to come of the case is the possibility that it will advance the Court’s continuing effort to confine and explain its 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
Meanwhile, a few other bills of interest remain alive. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:46 am
Michigan tried it a few years ago, and its testing program was struck down as unconstitutional in a case called Marchwinski v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:58 pm
” Parkson v. [read post]
