Search for: "Able v. United States"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 10,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
These efforts increase political polarization, sow discord, generate mistrust in governments and institutions, and undermine the national security of the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
Specifically, patent protection is acquired through a public application process with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Ultimately, the greatest significance of the Winn-Dixie decision may lie in its potential to finally thrust this issue into the United States Supreme Court on Gil’s anticipated petition for certiorari in the near future. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Ultimately, the greatest significance of the Winn-Dixie decision may lie in its potential to finally thrust this issue into the United States Supreme Court on Gil’s anticipated petition for certiorari in the near future. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Ultimately, the greatest significance of the Winn-Dixie decision may lie in its potential to finally thrust this issue into the United States Supreme Court on Gil’s anticipated petition for certiorari in the near future. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
” (Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 8:11 am
United States, a case that will determine once and for all the scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:30 am
Kazlauskas v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
Howard: "Being completely non-technical it relates to the same invention, but the fact that it relates to the same invention does not lead to the conclusion that the patent of that invention in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and China is valid. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 7:43 am
The plaintiff in the case of Peden v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm
That trend could be reinforced should the ITC no longer be able to impose import bans on willing licensees--unless, of course, the ITC ultimately set the bar for an implementer's willingness to take a FRAND license similarly high as German courts under Sisvel v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
Morgan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am
The Supreme Court considered a number of decisions by the ECtHR, including Unite the Union v United Kingdom [2017] IRLR 438, in which it was held that member states have a wide margin of discretion in how they protect trade union freedom. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 6:37 am
Thanks to the research of Emma Reynolds of Drexel Law School and Intern at the Philadelphia Federal Defender, Capital Habeas Unit, we are able to offer a summary of how states handle this key issue. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:55 am
In the United States there are statutes of limitations for most criminal charges. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:17 pm
The “national origin” category can apply to individuals who are not originally from the United States and also to people who are perceived to have a particular national origin. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
United States, a case somewhat similar to Blagojevich’s. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
That year the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Troxel v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Jus Gentium Journal of International Legal History is the first dedicated journal in the United States to address the history of international law. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or regulatory… [read post]
