Search for: "People v Trump" Results 3221 - 3240 of 4,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Live Science has examined how the Net Neutrality debate affects people’s Internet. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The UK GDPR has previously been successful in suing people who may have undesirable/compromising information about an someone on their device. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The case related to articles published in March 2019, containing allegations that Dr Harcombe and Dr Kendrick had made knowingly false statements about the cholesterol-lowering drug, statins; and that they had thereby caused large numbers of people not to take statins, causing harm to public health. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 2:03 pm by Ilya Somin
Sadly, Gorsuch himself has helped perpetuate and extend the plenary power doctrine by voting with the majority in Trump v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
New York, where SCOTUS held that New York and other blue states had standing to challenge the Trump administration's addition of a citizenship question to the census. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
In the original 1964 photo, King flashed the “V for victory” sign after learning the US Senate had passed the civil rights bill. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The backdrop of the Dominion v Fox case Just days ago, Murdoch’s Fox settled what would have been one of the biggest defamation case of all time. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm by Omar Khodor
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:52 am by jonathanturley
., joined the growing ranks of members of Congress in issuing a warning to the Supreme Court: reaffirm Roe v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court decision in 2013, and another this year, weakened the landmark law, while Republican-controlled Legislatures passed new voting restrictions advocates say target people of color, as well as young and working-class people. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
That the right to free speech may trump trade mark rights was recognised by the Constitutional Court of South Africa in Laugh It Off Promotions v South African Breweries etc., 27th May 2005, Case CCT 42/04 [on which see IPKat here]. ...14. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
The state court in that case explained that in 1970, in Williams v. [read post]