Search for: "Waits v. State"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 10,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm
Khan had waited too long to seek their return. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:12 pm
Goliath v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:50 am
This is an issue worth fighting for, as the recent order in Sherfey v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 5:00 am
In the case of Gainer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:03 am
Oregon on State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:59 pm
Instead, we have assumed such an exception and have evaluated the actual innocence claims themselves, waiting until a state prisoner shows actual innocence to answer the legal question. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
Welles v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:52 am
As a practical matter, the case merely extends the Heller status quo to the states and seems unlikely to change the realities of gun regulation. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 5:56 am
In Lowery v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:53 pm
Kawashima v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am
Such laws were held unconstitutional in 2003, but as so often happens, they remained on the books in Utah, just waiting to cause trouble. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 12:35 pm
Williams in the opinion issued July 27 in Gammett v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
Waite v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:42 pm
Avery v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:23 am
I would not have been surprised if this little statutory case had been a letdown after the constitutional concerns with which the justices began their morning in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 3:07 am
TC Heartland v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:46 am
Chamberlain’s girlfriend called Barnett and left him a message stating Chamberlain was afraid because inmates were asking for his paperwork. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
In his opinion dissenting from denial of a stay in the Arkansas execution case, McGehee v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 1:25 pm
In Watterson Construction Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am
Mr Justice Sales stated that although there was an “interference” under ECHR, art 8(1), this was justified under ECHR, art 8(2) as proportionate. [read post]
