Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 3221 - 3240
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2010, 11:52 am
Not to say that defendants with previous felony convictions don't sometimes get probation with a judges approval either through a Presentence Investigation or through a plea bargain after prosecutor is convinced based on the facts that probation is warranted. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm
We of course can't say, and the judicial urge to run away from prescription drug preemption has been strong after Levine. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 11:43 pm
"We have been testing it a bit and we don't have any definitive answers right now," McCarthy said. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm
But the parties haven't much litigated that alternative definition and in granting certiorari we didn't agree to address it either.With these preliminaries by the board, we can turn to the much narrowed question properly before us. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
We don't have to accept an ends-justify-the-means system. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:37 am
It's normal that people don't remember every little thing that happened in [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:00 am
There are some intervenors, but I don't know exactly which suppliers made an attempt to support Ford. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
That was, we thought, also the longstanding Ninth rule, based on a thoughtful opinion penned by Judge Thompson: United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
And, more spectacularly, over the past few weeks the 9th and 1st Circuits, in cases involving the "don't ask, don't tell" military policy, have both rejected the proposition that Lawrence was a rational basis case. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
(Don't we look like we're analyzing?) [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am
I don’t feel that here. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 10:10 pm
One would hope that prosecutors would leave well enough alone, but don't count on it. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:19 pm
As readers who use our No Injury Scorecard know, we're very interested in identifying situations where plaintiffs - and especially consumer fraud plaintiffs - get dismissed because they don't have (or don't choose to allege) a legally sufficient injury.Why? [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 10:22 am
We don't take it in the first instance. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:14 am
Our rovers have better eyes than any human, and we don't have to take their word it; everyone can see what they see. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:14 am
Whether the four includes Balducci, or means the Scruggses, Backstrom and Patterson, I don't know. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:24 am
But if we don't do it, do it continually and pursue it even though it may well be futile in any particular case, then we are complicit in the conviction of defendants based upon phony evidence. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 10:32 am
These defendants often have housing and medication issues other defendants don't have, she says.Earlier coverage of the PD office is here and here. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:48 am
It might be, but it almost always isn't, and in fact in Tennessee is should be higher than the amount that you reasonably expect the case to be worth because (a) you cannot collect a judgment in excess of the ad damnum and (b) I don't know of a lawyer who is talented enough to predict with 100% certainty 100% of the time who will win the case much less the exact amount of money that will be awarded. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
We've also ended up writing this as something of a tag team. [read post]
