Search for: "Fair v. State" Results 3241 - 3260 of 27,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The Barclay Brothers successfully argued that the dual role of the office of Seneschal, as President of the Chief of Pleas and chief judge, meant that the 2008 Law was incompatible with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) (the right to a fair trial). [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 9:53 pm by Florian Mueller
The calendar of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit still states that each side will get 10 minutes in the third criminal case; maybe another judge will fill in or they have some other solution.Presumably the three judges to whom the case was assigned--and their clerks--have already spent a fair amount of time analyzing the case, and hopefully they will remain in charge.For a civil law case, Epic Games v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is Redeemer Committee of Highland Credit Strategies Funds v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release  which meant that the claimant,  Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:40 am
Yesterday was the 50th anniversary of the day in 1963 when the United State Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling of Brady v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:19 am by Chijioke Okorie
For example, it was suggested that for the quotation exception in section 12B(1)(a) of the CAB, the “fair practice” standard should be explicitly stated so that the quotation exception will only apply inter alia where the quotation “is compatible with fair practice”. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 10:46 am by Steven Boutwell
   The removed actions included two separate matters filed in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana – Warren Lester, et. al. v. [read post]