Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 3241 - 3260 of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am by INFORRM
Similarly, in the context of harm to national security, the courts have baulked at the inclusion of prior notification obligations in court orders, prefering to allow editors to assess for themselves the legal risk and to bear the responsibility for error of judgment (see, for example, Attorney General v Times Newspapers [2001] EWCA Civ 97, at [24]-[35], per Lord Phillips MR). [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 12:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Legal Approach Questions of insurance coverage interpretation are decided as a matter of state – and not federal – law. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
 European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
The Judge quoted Lord Brightman in Ex p. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
The Judge quoted Lord Brightman in Ex p. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:04 pm by MacIsaac
  In my opinion it is stated briefly and accurately in the following passage in the judgment of Aylesworth J.A., concurred in by Robertson C.J.O., in Woodward v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: WILLIAM WALTON+JOHN WEIR FRASER+MRS MAGGIE FRASER AGAINST A DECISION MADE BY THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS DATED 21 DECEMBER 2009 FROM THE DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORT v. , 11 August 2011, Lord Tyre: Road building a rerouting decisions in Scotland did not breach human rights of local residents. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The Bill is currently in the Committee Stage of the House of Lords after its second reading on 19 December 2023. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
  Here there is inconsistency in the approach taken by different members of the House of Lords in Ali. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Dave
  Here there is inconsistency in the approach taken by different members of the House of Lords in Ali. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am by Frank Cranmer
: on the recent decisions in Onuoha v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust and Kovalkovs v 2 Sisters Food Group Limited. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:36 am by Sam Murrant
In the courts RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38Supreme Court: asylum seekers cannot be expected to lie or dissemble in order to achieve safety in their own country. ? [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:38 am
(Internet Cases)   Global - Trade Marks Non-commercial groups oppose changes in ICANN Committee (Intellectual Property Watch)   Global - Patents Lord Hoffman in agreement with Tufty the Cat on software patents? [read post]