Search for: "Application of Jackson" Results 3261 - 3280 of 3,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Both Parties Wonder: How much do conventions even matter anymore? [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Roughly speaking, plaintiffs in northern Illinois, which is more urban, lost; plaintiffs in southern Illinois, which is more rural, were successful, and a judge there held that the statute was unconstitutional in all its applications and barred the state from enforcing it. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Destefano, No. 07-1428 and 08-328Title VII/Whether municipalities may decline to certify results of an exam that would make disproportionately more white applicants eligible for promotion than minority applicants, due to fears that certifying the results would lead to charges of racial discrimination.o Set for argument April 22, 2009o SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSWIKI hereo Cornell Law School/LIIo Noted here: Los Angeles Times; Hartford Courant; SIOP;… [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
The case also presents the question whether a public-accommodation law that authorizes secular but not religious exemptions is generally applicable under Employment Division v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Banks, 126 S.Ct. 2572 (2006), held that Mills was not retroactively applicable on collateral review. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 7:10 am by Darren E. Tromblay
One clear example of this activity was the Soviet Union’s (unsuccessful) search for compromising information about Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson, who was known for his opposition to Moscow.[3] The KGB attempted to find information indicating that Jackson was a homosexual and, failing to identify anything factual, resorted to a forgery campaign directed at painting him as gay.[4] In today’s political environment, a foreign power could easily conduct similar… [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes published criminal decisions released by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on April 20, 2021. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
We considered the theories under which government is organized and their application to the United States, the development of a hierarchy of law, its relation to the law developed in international for a, and then considered the issue of legal integrity through the notion of “rule of law” as a political and juridical concept. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 The court explained that the primary thrust of RPI’s action is the regulatory authority of the Board over the application of the public trust doctrine to interconnected ground and surface water. [read post]
10 May 2019, 3:01 am by Jim Sedor
    National/Federal A Lawsuit About Trump and the NRA Could Upend How the Government Polices Campaign Finance Mother Jones – Nihal Krishan | Published: 5/1/2019 A lawsuit involving the National Rifle Association (NRA) is poised to act as a major test for the FEC chairperson’s new strategy to force the agency to take more aggressive action to police campaign finance law. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
The Supreme Court’s “Presumptive Immunity” Standard An especially baffling aspect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 10:57 am by Gus Hurwitz
This essay began as a response to claims that the argument that Chevron encourages congressional inaction has been refuted by the best available evidence. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
  For example, you discuss Chief Justice Warren’s decision to chair the Warren Commission and Justice Jackson’s involvement in the Nuremberg trials. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
(Indeed, as Jack describes the internal administration disagreements over applicable legal principles, and political strategies about whether to seek further congressional support, it appears to me clear that Jack Goldsmith is Exhibit A for those who hold these concerns: Jack's posture toward congressional statutes like the War Powers Resolution and FISA is to regard them as setting strong presumptive limits on presidential power, rather than Youngstown-Category-I "safe… [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm by Caroline A. Crenshaw
Thank you Hal [Scott] for that kind introduction and for inviting me to speak today. [read post]