Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 3261 - 3280 of 8,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2009, 12:04 pm
Several groups. individuals, cities, and counties who petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to review the FAA's decision to move forward with its redesign of the New York/New Jersey/Pennsylvania airspace have filed Petitions for Rehearing after the rather surprising D.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 6:32 am by Ted Frank
[Slate] Innocent identity theft victim can't get himself from Washington state sex offender registry. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
David Souter,  69,  has expressed some interest in leaving Washington and returning to his home state of New Hampshire. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:08 am by Will Baude
The applicants claim that regulatory "chaos" would occur due to an alleged conflict between the relief awarded in these cases and the relief provided by a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am by Amanda Rice
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On June 27, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States held in the case of Voisine v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:13 am
In its opinion, issued in July 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Mr. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:26 am by James Bickford
  In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on the sequels to Citizens United, which are raising “[i]ssues such as how the government may regulate disclosure of spending, and whether bans on direct corporate contributions to candidates” are permissible. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:33 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington has certified a partial final judgment (this post continues below the document): 13-11-12 Microsoft v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We also have some SCOTUS talk on LXBN TV as Antoinette Konski joins us to talk Mayo v. [read post]