Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 3261 - 3280
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 4:20 am
Don't worry our naive heads about it, as they will protect us from the evil people. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 3:58 am
We don't know what the penalty for conviction will be next month or next year. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:35 am
Judges don't want to do it. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
You can't do that. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:14 pm
I really don't care. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:08 am
What was said we don't know, and the government response says "No recording or written record of the conversation was made. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
That was, we thought, also the longstanding Ninth rule, based on a thoughtful opinion penned by Judge Thompson: United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 1:24 pm
I don't think that the First understands this. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:53 am
For the time being, make sure that you don't pretend to be anyone you're not on the internet. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
Although that case involved copyright, not trademarks, its reasoning seems highly analogous--ESPECIALLY when combined with the first fact that "copycat goods" aren't per se illegal. 2) the facts don’t specify what metatags were used, but we know that (a) Google ignores keyword metatags and (b) judges mistakenly think that keyword metatags are the holy grail of SEO. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
Yet when we walk into a courtroom, we're no longer directing our attorneys or staff -- who act at our beck and call -- or controlling the fates of large businesses and institutions -- instead we're talking to six guys or gals in tank tops or bedroom slippers who don't give a hail who you are. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:45 am
Unlike others, however, I don't understand too much of what I read. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:44 am
I don't understand why agencies shouldn't settle cases, as Eisenger and Judge Rakoff appear to suggest - that's what they do. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 4:59 pm
I don't know, but I'm confident he would be support the job we do. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm
That’s the truth, but we don’t think it’s the whole truth. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am
It said it didn't use racial data at all, only political data. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
We have one, you don’t, so we win. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
We say “almost” because we here at Relist Watch are not the forgiving type. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 10:16 pm
I don't doubt that's true. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:49 am
Most will not want to – don't take it personally. [read post]
