Search for: "Johnson v. United States" Results 3321 - 3340 of 3,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:26 am by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
Renewable Fuel Standard Program EPA is also responsible for developing and implementing regulations to ensure that transportation fuel sold in the United States contains a minimum volume of renewable fuel. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Rulings               IPSO has published a series of rulings and a Resolution Statement from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 01019-18 Cantemir v Mail Online – Resolved via IPSO Mediation 18938-17 Johnson v The Sun – Breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) 20445-17 De Groote v thetimes.co.uk – No breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy) after investigation 20562-17 Versi v… [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
But the Patriot Act amended the SMTJ statute to make clear that it covers overseas bases, at least "with respect to offenses committed by or against a national of the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 28, 2009)No implied cause of action under >>1981 for terminated White employee's race discrim claimt>4th Circuit>> Johnson v Mechanics & Farmers Bank, No. 07-1725 (4th Cir. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
However, district courts may not exercise their habeas jurisdiction to enjoin the United States from transferring individuals alleged to have committed crimes and detained within the territory of a foreign sovereign to that sovereign's government for criminal prosecution. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
It's an obligation when they take that oath to faithfully uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. . . . [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am by SHG
That United States District Judge Paula Xinis included this paragraph in her recitation of “facts” is the first hint. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 12:12 am by Frank Cranmer
Clare Ryan, Strasbourg Observers: Lee v the United Kingdom: A trend toward heightened pleading standards? [read post]