Search for: "State v. Cook" Results 3321 - 3340 of 3,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
 Reliance upon cooking by the consumer does not seem like a good idea. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
In simple English: If a painless lethal injection should be unconstitutional, then you can be killed by any method the state cooks up, painless or otherwise.So we have this method of killing, and bodies are dropping like flies until May 2, 2006. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
 It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm by Adam Feldman
Conversely, Barrett authored an opinion coded as “liberal” in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:40 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/Q3mYPY (Dennis Kiker) States Enacting Rules on Use of Electronic Data in Medical Liability Cases – http://bit.ly/NztMYc (IHealthBeat) Technology Review: A FrameWork for Managing People, Technology and Processes - http://bit.ly/NrQlhv (Lynn Frances) Tips for Identifying and Preserving ESI – http://bit.ly/OXF9Xj (James Bernard, Michael Quartararo, Jason Vinokur) Twitter Contempt Sanctions Increase Need for Social Media Governance Plan… [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 5:00 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 10:28 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 7:23 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm by Bill Marler
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[40] What is Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome? [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 1:59 am by Frank Cranmer
A recent Australian decision in the case of Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156[2] highlights the problem. [read post]