Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 3321 - 3340 of 20,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Yuval Shany
Still, for the purposes of issuing provisional measures, it is enough for the Court to establish that the rights asserted in the claim are at least plausible. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) Yesterday, the Supreme Court refused to hear United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 10:10 am by Scott Bomboy
With the latest federal court filings, the case of TikTok v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:48 pm
 By Andrew Wooley: The Supreme Court of Texas issued a decision on rehearing in Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:39 pm by Adam Feldman
Although many are speculating about the actions of the current “conservative” Supreme Court (see these recent examples from CNN, USA Today and The Hill), the court’s specific decisions are still very much up in the air, as are the justices’ decision-making processes. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am by JB
Note that if the Court struck down Proposition 8 on the merits, it might be difficult to avoid striking down bans on same-sex marriage in other states (although this is still possible if the Court relied on Romer v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:30 am by Venkat
Court: ZIP Code is personal identification info under credit card statute but plaintiff must still allege harm—Tyler v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
While this moggy was struggling to get back from Indonesia, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in the pregabalin appeal Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (13 October 2016), and finally the IPKat has managed to blog about it (the lateness by no means reflecting on the importance of the judgment).It is very much a judgment of three halves.In the first part of the judgment (up to [135]), which substantively… [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Rodriguez v United States (6-3 decision written by Justice Ginsberg) Facts: Officer Struble observed a Mercury Mountaineer veer slowly onto the shoulder of a Nebraska highway for about 1 to 2 seconds and then jerk back onto the road. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:19 am by Amy Howe
There is still more commentary on Friedrichs v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
She was conscious that the proceedings were court proceedings, and even specifically considered whether anything said in her report could prejudice the proceedings, but still it did not dawn on her that the use of the pictures was prohibited or might amount to a contempt of court. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
Via AdamB, another reason why Justice Alito is a disastrous addition to the Court (surely O'Connor would not have voted with themajoprity in this case.) [read post]