Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 10,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
” Considering the six non-exhaustive factors set forth in Section 43(c)(2)(B)(i)-(vi), the Board found that opposer would likely suffer an impairment of the distinctiveness of its mark, even though opposer had no current involvement in real estate, since many luxury brands have licensed use of their marks in connection with hotels, and other have found opportunities in related areas, like interior design services and bathroom fixtures.Boi Na Braza, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:45 am
See Russell v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:06 pm
A 2002 survey revealed that the easement for lot C actually ran through a house on Lot B. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Wilson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
Proc. 97-35, and cases like RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
The scope of © shouldn’t grow b/c an author has made six works when the six works made by six different authors would have a smaller scope of ©. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:33 pm
In Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:17 am
ô terre déplorable! [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm
In particular, Amsted argues that Subparagraph (A) of §337(a)(1), as opposed to subparagraphs (B)-(D), is based on common law rather than statutory intellectual property rights. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:42 am
§ 16921(b)(3). [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
RT: bifurcation might not work well b/c copying drives so much, but worth testing empirically. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
All claims arising out of (a) a riot or insurrection, (b) a civil disturbance resulting in an official proclamation of a state of emergency, (c) a temporary curfew, or (d) martial law are agreed to constitute one ‘occurrence. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:21 pm
The decision is Colasanto v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:40 am
Read the opinion in Pannu v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 7:22 pm
Here is the judge’s reasoning: “I have come to this conclusion based on the following: (a) [the father's] repeated failures to pay monthly child support, as ordered, for more than a year despite having an ability to do so; (b) [the father's] communication to [the mother] that other than child support, what could he do to assist her in parenting [the child]; (c) [the father's] actions in placing $20 in [the child's] backpack which went back and forth with [the child] as… [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 9:14 am
The case Villareal v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 7:30 am
Schwartz v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Harris v. [read post]
