Search for: "People v. Saling"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
Worse still, Proposition 13 rewarded people who don’t sell their old houses – old people who are likely to be net consumers of public services – while indirectly penalizing those who do buy new houses – younger people who are likely to be net contributors to public services. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
(Lucas v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
People who were born before ads could be skipped will be thinking of (various) lonely repairmen, because the smelly washing machine cases are back: BSH Home Appliances Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:13 am
In State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:13 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
The tax is imposed on revenue from digital advertising served to people in Maryland, which will drive up the cost of advertising to Marylanders. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm
Defendant cites the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Jose Padilla v Kentucky, 130 S. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Piacentile v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
That’s how the court in Higgins v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:21 am
Felis v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:17 am
You know what people remember? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
For instance, could they have prevented the manufacture and sale of Wandjina tea towels? [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:13 am
Despite the fact that regulation 1 provides a definition of what it means to “promote”, regulation 7(2) describes the list of prohibited practices to include, inter alia, sale devices such as rebates, benefits in kind, kickbacks or any other pecuniary advantages, special displays to promote sales, advertisements about the availability of the product at a specific retail outlet and the price of the product, tie-in sales, discounts in any form, competitions with… [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:29 am
§ 240.10b-5. [4] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:29 am
§ 240.10b-5. [4] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 5:24 am
Jordan v. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:21 pm
I am sure that when most people think about the kind of organization that might engage in an Initial Coin Offering (ICO), they typically are thinking of a start-up venture — an enterprise trying to get off the ground. [read post]
25 May 2008, 9:13 am
Supreme Court's 2002 decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
See District of Columbia et al. v. [read post]
