Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 14,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
In both decisions, Judge Posner was on a panel with Chief Judge Easterbrook, so the intellectual lineup behind the opinions was as strong and fearsome as Billy Williams batting after Banks.Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:45 pm
But it nonetheless remains a pretty strong indictment of what transpired here.Nor does the majority shy away from responding to the dissent. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:48 am
Some, like the California statute on which the federal bill is modeled, provide strong protection against weak suits over the exercise of free speech rights. [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:23 am
"It's a little less strong, however, when you read on, because at that point you realize that that "inaccurate and misleading" nature of the testimony at issue doesn't actually go to the merits of the DNA analysis, but instead relates to how those findings were presented. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:57 am
The decision was premised on a strong affirmation of the right to acquire property. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:32 am
In addition to the other sentencing action from SCOTUS today, the Justices also vacated a ruling of the Tenth Circuit in a prison conditions case in Erickson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
This strategy might cause people to remember that the Governor of Arkansas in the 1950's claimed that Brown v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The Ohio Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:54 am
In Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
To the extent Trump v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm
It stated: “Even acceptingas true Plantronics’ assertions on these secondary considerations,they do not save Plantronics from summaryjudgment here since such secondary considerations simplycannot overcome a strong prima facie case of obviousness. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
Those developments were treated as strong points already in Bond’s favor before a Court that is sensitive to the Constitution’s “structural limits” on federal power. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:34 am
” (quoting Hilton v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:10 pm
” The 7-2 decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
KSR v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
Tugendhat J refused to make such a determination (Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB)). [read post]
