Search for: "Line v. State" Results 3361 - 3380 of 28,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am by Jason Shinn
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am by Jason Shinn
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard):  On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am by Kit Molloy
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Cooper (test case) [2011] UKSC 60This is a decision of the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:21 am by Kit Molloy
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Cooper (test case) [2011] UKSC 60This is a decision of the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:31 am by Eric Goldman
This line of thinking was expressly rejected in the Backpage litigation over state laws that required verification that people depicted in prostitution ads were over 18. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 12:45 pm by Bill Ward
The clear message in Gallenthin was that this practice would no longer be tolerated by the state’s highest court, and the lower courts have fallen in line. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:26 am by Jason Rantanen
Cir 2019)18-1167.Opinion.7-30-2019 Panel: Prost (author), Bryson, Reyna While Oil States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:48 am by Sean Wajert
The state Supreme Court granted an appeal to determine whether § 552 imposes tort liability for economic losses to a contractor caused when a gas utility company fails to mark or improperly marks the location of gas lines. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On September 16, 2015, the federal government decided to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the case of Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]