Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 39,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2007, 9:13 am
People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I’ve long been interested in when speech may be restricted because it conveys information that may help people commit a crime; my Crime-Facilitating Speech, 57 Stan. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:23 pm
On May 26, 2016, the Supreme Court issued its decision in People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:42 pm
In People v Colville (2010 NY Slip Op 07185 [2nd Dept. [read post]
6 May 2008, 8:21 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:40 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:24 am
Its overbreadth seems fairly stunning to me, and it has the distinct read of a magistrate's use of a veritable rubber stamp.Second, while I (of course) agree with Judge Fernandez that we prefer that police officers seek a warrant before -- as here -- smashing down the doors of innocent people's homes at 5:00 a.m., I don't think we see this process entirely eye-to-eye. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:43 pm
Yesterday a divided Supreme Court ruled in Florence v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:49 pm
Today in People v Louree, 2007 NY Slip Op 04679, the Court of Appeals held that where a trial judge does not fulfill the obligation to advise a defendant of postrelease supervision during a plea allocution, the defendant may challenge the plea as not knowing, voluntary and intelligent on direct appeal, notwithstanding the absence of a postallocution motion. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:25 pm
In Southwell v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:20 pm
In Mildred Najera v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 6:11 am
Areas that are rural are usually more inclined to have people who own animals of one type or another. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:33 am
V. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The duty is about protecting people from the poisonous and pernicious influence of extremist ideas that are used to legitimise terrorism. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:47 am
Now, you may question whether that is an invasion of privacy (and many people happily (or maybe unknowingly) permit their telephone number to be transmitted to the person they are calling, but Parliament, the ALRC and the Privacy Commissioner (pdf see p. 402) have taken the view that it is, or should be. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:16 am
Would people looking for a dog daycare likely be confused by a logo that looks like the Starbucks® logo but says Starbarks Daycare? [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
