Search for: "Adam Wagner" Results 321 - 340 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Wagner and Leonardo Mangat preview the case for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:07 pm by Charon QC
  We hope that Hugh Tomlinson QC, a leading light on privacy and other legal matters, and Adam Wagner of 1 Crown Office Row and The UK Human Rights blog – will be able to join us – work permitting. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Wagner preview the case for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:04 am by Rosalind English
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Adam Wagner’s witness statement to the Leveson Inquiry Part 1 and Part 2 First they came for the journalists.. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 11:30 pm by seo
Pauls Boulevard and Brambleton Avenue Little Creek Road and Chesapeake Boulevard Source: City of Norfolk Petersburg Crater and Wagner Roads Washington and Adams Streets Source: NBC 12 Richmond Elkhardt and Hull Streets Source: Richmond Times Dispatch Virginia Beach Virginia Beach Blvd at Independence Blvd Indian River Road at Kempsville Road Indian River Road at Military Highway Holland Road at Rosemont Road General Booth Blvd at Dam Neck Road Virginia Beach Blvd at Great Neck Road… [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:36 am by Frank Cranmer
Nevertheless, the outcome was succinctly summarized by barrister Adam Wagner of Doughty Street Chambers, whose Twitter thread on these events was prefaced with the comment “I think the outcome of the Met investigation is that the Prime Minister attended 6 illegal gatherings but attended 5 of them legally”. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am by Ed Bates, University of Southampton
I agree with Adam Wagner’s comments that the Attorney General’s speech should (if I may respectfully say so) be applauded for the mature and positive way it addressed some very important issues regarding the future protection of human rights at both the domestic and European level. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 2:06 am by Seán Binder
Stern, and Adam Taylor report for the Washington Post. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 1:39 pm by Charon QC
Adam Wagner and the UK Human Rights blog has this news: President of Family Division’s press release on paedophile allegations case With thanks to the Judicial Press Office, below is the full press release from the President of the Family Division in a case involving a “super injunction”, John Hemming MP, false allegations of pedophilia and some poor press reporting. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In practice, UK freedom of speech rights are more constrained than, for example, in the United States, where even “hate speech” is generally protected under the First Amendment to the US Constitution (see Adam Wagner’s post on the Congressman Giffords shooting for more). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:47 am by Rosalind English
Whilst they may have been unwise to pick on that particular judgment – which as Adam Wagner points out involved the EU law on free movement on persons rather than Article 8  although arguably Article 8 forms part of the “general principles” of EU law so was relevant to that case as well – the point is a valid one and will not go away;  see our posts on the issue of deportation of foreign criminals here, here,  here, here and here. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:16 am by Colin Murray
As Adam Wagner of the UK Human Rights Blog pointed out, the decision had nothing to do with the individual in question having a cat, and everything to do with the Home Office’s failure to follow its own guidance on the deportation of foreign national offenders with a settled partner in the UK. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
Public Inquiries in the digital age In November 2011, barrister Adam Wagner, described how the Leveson Inquiry marked “a minor landmark for open justice”, on the UK Human Rights blog. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm by Dave
  Four of the essential points made by Judge Howell were also present in this matter: the wide margin of appreciation in matters of social policy; hb was just one of the benefits to which RG and his household were entitled (although this might, in itself, have reaised a point of discrimination: at [28]); increased costs of administrations of difficult questions around whether children could reasonably share a bedroom (Judge Turnbull has obviously heard of my children, a case for a bright line… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:37 am by Cian Murphy
Today, on the UK Human Rights blog, Adam Wagner notes that this is “a vexed question”: Modern terrorist organisations are clandestine and diffuse, and preventing support can therefore fairly require wide powers. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 5:55 am
Posted by Brian Cheffins (University of Cambridge), on Thursday, April 16, 2020 Tags: Corporate Social Responsibility, Director primacy, Hostile takeover, Milton Friedman, Pay for performance, Shareholder activism, Shareholder primacy, Shareholder rights, Shareholder value, Stakeholders SEC Proposal: Improving Access to Capital in Private Markets Posted by Adam Fleisher, Jeffrey Karpf and Leslie Silverman, Cleary Gottlieb Steen… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:59 am by INFORRM
BBC (see Adam Wagner’s post here) had been decided by the Supreme Court a few days before his case got to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 2:11 am by Seán Binder
Karla Adam reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:32 am by Charon QC
   Lucy Reed, barrister and author of The Pink Tape blog, has a thoughtful piece on Clare’s law in the Guardian this week: Why Clare’s Law won’t prevent domestic violence Making law accessible to the public Adam Wagner, I Crown Office Row and editor of the excellent UK Human Rights blog has a good piece in The Guardian this week: As legal aid reforms threaten access to lawyers, there are three relatively inexpensive ways to improve public access to… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:55 am by INFORRM
Nevertheless, as Adam Wagner pointed out in a post on the UK Human Rights Blog about the Hardeep Singh case, “whilst some issues are straightforwardly “religious” in nature, some are less so, and the courts may sometimes be willing to rule on an issue even if a group effected by the ruling sees it as essentially religious in character. [read post]