Search for: "Application of American Broadcasting Companies" Results 321 - 340 of 553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2015, 10:32 am by Dan Kirkpatrick
That’s because it’s a publicly traded company whose stock is widely held by companies or individuals, some foreign, some not. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:54 pm by Howard Knopf
 Indeed, it may have been arguable that the evidence in this case was no better and perhaps even worse than the evidence in the BMG case  (in which I was counsel for CIPPIC) over a decade ago, where Shaw, Telus and CIPPIC were successful in stopping the plaintiff American record companies in in their tracks because their evidence was essentially all hearsay and unreliable. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
* A little rienergy can't save Coke-alike trade mark application, says General CourtLaura Alonso (Moyng Monegier, Spain) pens an analysis of Case T-384/13 Intermark srl v OHIM, The Coca-Cola Company, a decision in which the GC addressed registrability of a sign including the word ‘COLA’ drafted in Coca‑Cola’s ‘classic white cursive script on a red background’.* International Women’s Leadership Forum: a report on the… [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm by Cody Poplin
Elsewhere, the Times shares that the demand for bailouts by Russian companies is skyrocketing, raising the likelihood of an economic crisis. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
” The Netflix show’s application, filed by MRC II Distribution Company L.P., is for: entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of drama; entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring drama provided through Internet transmission and streaming services; entertainment, namely, a continuing dramatic television show broadcast over Internet websites and streaming services. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
In 1967 Ltd & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 3444 (Ch) (23 October 2014), another UK court held that foreign BitTorrent websites that offered services to UK users was subject to UK copyright laws. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 2:58 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Sometimes that experimentation has pushed very traditional companies into new directions. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 But some justices also raised concerns that a decision siding with the television broadcasters could have far-reaching effects on new Internet, cloud and other technologies - and companies such as Google, Microsoft, DropBox and Box would then be swept up in other questions about the reach of copyright laws. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:41 am by Steve Lovelady
 In a letter to the Washington Post, he proposed opposing TV and radio station license renewal applications as a means to stop the “unnecessary” use by broadcasters of the offensive word. [read post]
Part 1: Introduction to Native Advertising Part 2 below examines the genesis of native advertising and how existing FTC regulations may be applicable to the practice today. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
The first hurdle is jurisdiction, the right of an American court to make a ruling that binds the British company. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
They called it “a serious setback for the music community in Canada” and “for artists and the music companies who invest in their careers”. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am by Glenn
Yet as multinational American corporations face increased scrutiny from new competition regimes in China, Brazil and other developing nations, there will likely be more of them adopting the French and European Union approach, one more ambiguous and more open to populist, protectionist application than in the U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:14 am by Ron Coleman
 sent me: The Supreme Court’s recent decision in American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 1:30 pm by Stephen Gottlieb
— This commentary was broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report, July 8, 2014. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
Just how much depends on each company’s policy and applicable legislation. [read post]