Search for: "Barr v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 939
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2021, 7:56 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:40 am
Supreme Court in 2005 in Van Orden v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 12:57 pm
Scalia also represented Bush in Bush v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm
Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
Finally, at the (Wilkes-Barre, Pa.) [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:02 am
And the Court issued a per curiam ruling in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:56 pm
Buckley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
Barr Rules that a Defective NTA cannot be “Perfected” by a Subsequent Notice of Hearing (5-22-19) Ortiz-Santiago v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 6:34 pm
The accusation occurred during a conversation between the defendant and the agents on the poor state of Wilkes-Barre due to the drug trade. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 11:32 am
Barr: The immigration case involves the “stop-time rule. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
Last week, in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
Steiner v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 10:32 am
(See Atkins v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 12:29 am
"The outcome of this case will affect Texas in addition to all other states with RFRA laws as well as the national RFRA which protects all U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:51 pm
Poe); cast doubt on severability doctrine (Barr v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:39 pm
Barr 20-11Issue: Whether, when a state’s definition of a drug expressly sweeps in more substances than the federal definition, a noncitizen convicted of possessing that drug bears the burden of showing in deportation proceedings under 8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) that the state has actually prosecuted a criminal defendant with respect to one of the non-federally-controlled substances. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Canal Auth. of State of Fla. v. [read post]
