Search for: "Franks v. Delaware" Results 321 - 340 of 610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 11:31 am by Kara OBrien
1) The D&O Diary: Cornerstone Releases 2010 Securities Litigation Study - Kevin LaCroix breaks down the annual study released jointly by Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. 2) The Race to The Bottom: Business Roundtable v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 3:16 pm by Gustav L. Schmidt
  However, the recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision in Seinfeld v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
The author urges that the other circuits follow the Second Circuit in Madden v Midland because the Dodd-Frank was not made retroactive and therefore provides no relief against predatory lending abuses that occurred prior to the law's effectiveness date. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:06 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
The Plaintiff Is Injured by another Vehicle While Crossing the Street to Board the School Bus The plaintiff in the case of State Farm v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
Salceda, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder suits U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Congress preempted Delaware in 2002 with SOX and again in Dodd-Frank. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:08 am
Louis ("On appeal, the defendant claims that the court  improperly denied his motions (1) for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Had issuers supported the proposal by the Cox Commission, it is likely that Mary Schapiro's Commission would not have proposed an access rule, Dodd-Frank would not have given access authority to the Commission, and shareholders would not now be singularly focused on the issue. [read post]