Search for: "Garcia v. Garcia"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
On 2 November 2020, Nicol J handed down judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm
The government’s primary counter-argument, mirroring the 6th Circuit’s rationale in Garcia-Romo v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 9:53 am
In this case, the plaintiffs’ lead lawyers are Cris Armenta and Credence Sol–the same team that represented the plaintiff in Garcia v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 3:40 am
Thanks to a ruling this month by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department, in Garcia v Garcia, we can now welcome a third category of expulsion case, which we’ll dub cases involving a “naked” expulsion clause. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:26 pm
Appellants, Delmis Josefina Garcia de Portillo (“Portillo”) and Maria Isabel Saravia de Hernandez (“Saravia”), sued appellee, Evangeline Wotorson, claiming ... [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
Baker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
” South Bay (citing Garcia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
Maine In Jones v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 7:02 pm
” Garcia-Bengochea v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:59 pm
Ohio In Philip Randolph Institute v. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 9:32 am
Case citation: Maffick LLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:17 am
For example, in Garcia v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 12:14 pm
Criminal procedure — Question from jury — Definition of terms Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County of sexual abuse of a minor and second degree sexual offense, Jonathan Mancia-Garcia (“Mr. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
, ¿Como ampliar las vías de comunicación conectando a todo el País o por lo menos tener un plan que proyecte y lo garantice? [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.The Circuit Court reversed the lower court's decision, explaining that the evidence before the jury allowed it to reasonably conclude that Plaintiff was no longer resisting arrest and was not a safety threat to the officers, or others, at the time of Officer A used the taser against him a second time.Citing Garcia v. [read post]